Collaborative and Argumentative Models of Meeting Discussions
نویسندگان
چکیده
We report in this paper experiences and insights resulting from the first two years of work in two similar projects on meeting tracking and understanding. The projects are the DARPA-funded CALO project and the Swiss National research project IM2. The findings from these two projects have been shared and compared in order to come up with a joint ontology as a model for argumentative discussions in meetings. We highlight the complexity of the problem in modeling interaction and discourse in argumentative discussions and we propose a solution based on the construction of a specific knowledge base.
منابع مشابه
Individual and Collaborative Planning Conditions: Effects on Fluency, Complexity and Accuracy in L2 Argumentative Writing
Research on pre-task planning has revealed that planned conditions have produced more fluent and complex language than unplanned conditions. To date, most of these studies have investigated the effects of individual planning on language production while collaborative planning has received scant attention. To determine the effects of pre-task planning on second language written production, the p...
متن کاملAn Argumentative Annotation Schema for Meeting Discussions
In this article, we are interested in the annotation of transcriptions of human-human dialogue taken from meeting records. We first propose a meeting content model where conversational acts are interpreted with respect to their argumentative force and their role in building the argumentative structure of the meeting discussion. Argumentation in dialogue describes the way participants take part ...
متن کاملAnswering natural language queries on spoken dialogs in meeting discussions
In this article, we focus on the analysis of human-human multimodal dialogue and aim at structuring human discussions in meetings in order to develop a computational environment to answer user natural language queries related to the content of these discussions. We first define an annotation schema that describes from an argumentative point of view how segments of human discussions are coherent...
متن کاملFacilitating argumentative knowledge construction with computer-supported collaboration scripts
Online discussions provide opportunities for learners to engage in argumentative debate, but learners rarely formulate well-grounded arguments or benefit individually from participating in online discussions. Learners often do not explicitly warrant their arguments and fail to construct counterarguments (incomplete formal argumentation structure), which is hypothesized to impede individual know...
متن کاملWeb-Based Collaboration and Decision Making Support: A Multi-Disciplinary Approach
Arguing that a varying level of formality needs to be offered in systems supporting argumentative collaboration, this article proposes an incremental formalization approach that has been adopted in the development of CoPe_it!, a Web-based tool that complies with collaborative principles and practices, and provides members of communities engaged in argumentative discussions and decision making p...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2005